For a moment, let us ignore the idea that there's some gay ops going on with Lidl and consider the context of this and most of anything she says.
This kind of script-following is exactly the same kind of thing you see issued from Hollywood Hulk Hogan and Android Raptor. This is a gimmick. It is designed to get under your skin and halt any productive discussion.
The problem a lot of people have with Lidl is that everything she says is just baiting a fight with her. In almost every one of her reams, she makes several unbacked assertions that continually go unchallenged. In part, nobody will challenge her because doing so has repeatedly brought about the ire of Null. Also because BP users will sic Stan on other users and threaten them with doxes if they fly too close to the sun.
Because of how the Kiwi Farms works, Null will shrug off any users doxxing other users. This is the price you paid for putting your name on the Kiwi Farms. This is how Lidl gets her way every single time. She makes a gimmick scripted "femoid" post that is designed to bait a fight. Regardless if a fight happens or not, she goes and cries to Null who then white knights her and BP in general.
"Stop harassing or I'll destroy the Woman-Hate thread!"
Over and over and over again. It's always the men that are at fault for Lidl's constant sperging. What a poor, hapless victims!
Why is it that everyone
except for Null can see how one-sided the whole "gender war" thing is?
Anyway, I've brought this up with other former Kiwis and they've issued Lidl is just some ultra feminist. I disagree. Say what you want about the politics of feminism, at the very least a feminist might actually have some kind of goal by the end of the day and would engage in conversation in such a way as to achieve that goal without obligatorily being a bug others along the way. Even if one assumes a feminist has crazy ideals, at the very least they actually have ideals, right?
With Lidl the only thing that's consistent is that she invents wild stories which repeatedly belittle men and talk about how unfair it is for women. All stories or instances she refers to are anecdotal or otherwise strawmen. There is never anything substantive.
Let's take, for example, the fact that she didn't know that only livestock that give birth can produce milk:
View attachment 61438
Has no clue what she is talking about. But goes unchallenged because nobody wants to poke the lion. If you read most if not all her posts, she has very little real-world experience and, instead, most of what she says is something you would see promoted by 6B4T types.
A lot of what she posts regularly anything that fits a "men bad. women are oppressed" narrative. Take this recent example:
View attachment 61439
Right off the bat:
"Just look at the men on this website"
Okay, how? All anyone can see on KF are pfps. How the fuck does anyone "just look at the men" on the Kiwi Farms?
But what really gets me is nobody challenges this. Not even Null.
In fact, Null even engages in this kind of thing himself:
View attachment 61441
Let's go off on that tangent for a bit...
Null has essentially made a the case for intersectionality here.
"Waaah!! White women get all the anti-white racism from the Left and real mysogyny from the Right..."
"Women are the most un-catered to demographic! Waaah!!"
I dunno Josh. Ever think a man doesn't wonder how he will find a woman that won't fuck him over?
Both parties, men and women, have to put up with this shit. This is life.
Null obligitorily references Ethan Ralph as if Ethan is some kind of a paradigm.
Got news for you Null, not every man is Ethan Ralph.
And, shocker, few (if any) men even want to
be Ethan Ralph.
Next, Null says, "...you fall in love, but your man troons out..."
Yeah, I suppose that
can happen, but, how often does that even happen?
What exactly are the stats on that?
Imagine if someone said women shouldn't get married because, "What if a meteor hits the church as you say your vows?!"
Why is Null making sweeping judgments based on what affects a fraction of the general population?
Because Null lives in a bubble where the only "people" he can judge are lolcows. That's his reality.
He doesn't live in the real world. He thinks Ethan Ralph represents a demographic.
Null cannot even be bothered to remember Stephen Crowder's fucking name, but still believes he is so informed about women and Crowder's marital relationship as to cast judgment on him.
Null then retreats into, "You need to look at this from the woman's perspective."
So, is Null some kind of "woman whisperer" now?
Are we really taking advice from a single, childless, fatty who claims circumcision is to blame for his inability to orgasm inside a woman?
But on the forums, how does Null react whenever he is confronted with any of this?
"Bruh! It's 60/40. You're eliminated from the gene pool n' shiet. I'm right and high IQ. And if you disagree it sucks to be you."
Good logic, there Null. Totally on board with this clear line of thinking.
Okay...let's bring this back to Lidl and this screenshot:
View attachment 61439
From the get-go, this opinion should discarded because nobody knows who is or isn't a man on an anon website. Duh.
Next, "I get called a man all the time."
Never happened. Prove it.
"I am openly racist and homophobic. This is ok for men..."
No, half the population is not out and about being openly racist or homophobic. This is insane to assert.
"If a woman acts like she's selfish, she is judged for being selfish but If a man does this, he is admired."
This is generality that cannot really be proven either way.
I could say the exact opposite and it would have the same affect.
Despite that, as I said before, Null also engages in unproven generalities.
"This is just how the world is. Deal with it."
Then, there's last bit where she says, "at least online where men can't hurt you."
This is what really makes me think she is just begging for someone to say something she can complain to Null about.
This is baiting a fight.
She desperately wants someone to challenge what she says so she that can run to daddy.
This is her entire shtick. Her gimmick is to just bait people into getting angry, therefore giving her a reason to report to Null or to dox.
Incidentally, this attitude of "online where men can't hurt you" conflicts with the fact that BP users
do actively engage in doxxing other users.
Why claim that being online is safe but when anyone talks back to you, you then resort to involving the real world as reciprocation?
