Suggestion Box

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

@OnionNull, appoint @SIGSEGV to admin. kidding aside, the guy is actually making an effort to make the community work.

I agree

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

I will add more staff tonight. I will look at the cows on KF. Most of them should get the green light.

 

[Syrup]

I will add more staff tonight. I will look at the cows on KF. Most of them should get the green light.

I don’t thonk the fourm will succeed if every cow will have to pass through you before a thread is created.

 

[Loona]

I think to pass at least one or two mods should green light it similar to KF.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Rainbow Emoji (Optimistic) Added.

 

[Mario]

Rainbow Emoji (Optimistic) Added.

Optimistic

On a serious note the two sub-forums under the religious celbrities subforum should be made into mega threads in the original sub-forum. I didn't even notice they were their since you have to click on the little arrow for them to show up.

 

[Mario]

since OnionNull said he would pick more staff I nominate @{o}P for Global Mod.

 

[SIGSEGV]

since OnionNull said he would pick more staff I nominate @{o}P for Global Mod.

No.

 

[Syrup]

No.

But think how much it would piss off @Feline Darkmage.

Me being a mod and him not would be the funniest shit ever.

 

[Mario]

Can we have something similar to the prospering ground where we post the thread first before they are approved? Especially since anyone under 20,000 is supposed to be greenlit by OnionNull.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Can we have something similar to the prospering ground where we post OP fist before they are approved? Especially since anyone under 20,000 is supposed to be greenlit by OnionNull.

SIGSEGV was of the opinion that 20K in and of itself may not give a complete picture of underrated lolcows. I get the impression that him and some of the other members are saying that we should have a more holistic approach when it comes to deciding whether a thread would be viable. In other words, aside from the numbers, how much of an impact has that person had on internet culture per se?

 

[SIGSEGV]

SIGSEGV was of the opinion that 20K in and of itself may not give a complete picture of underrated lolcows. I get the impression that him and some of the other members are saying that we should have a more holistic approach when it comes to deciding whether a thread would be viable. In other words, aside from the numbers, how much of an impact has that person had on internet culture per se?

It's not only about their impact on internet culture. The questions to ask are:

• Is this person funny?
• Is there enough material to discuss so that the thread does not stagnate?
• Is this person likely to continue generating funny content?

 

[Mario]

SIGSEGV was of the opinion that 20K in and of itself may not give a complete picture of underrated lolcows. I get the impression that him and some of the other members are saying that we should have a more holistic approach when it comes to deciding whether a thread would be viable. In other words, aside from the numbers, how much of an impact has that person had on internet culture per se?

Idk, I just thought you guys came to the agreement that anyone below 20k had to be greenlit because of the problems it could cause. That's the only reason I was asking for one.

Followers seems pretty arbitrary when it comes to Lolcows but I understand why you would be hesitant to make threads on people who are not public figures.

 

[Ashley'sDemonCunt]

So how do you plan to get more users? Will you offer people who wish to support this place anything?

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

Donations at this point are not necessary. The Xenforo license, the Themehouse license, my webhosting and whatever else I need comes out of my own pocket. Will I need donations in the future? I don't have the answer to that but I would hope the answer would be no. As far as gaining more users to sign up, I have advertised on 8kun before. The staff were terrific in this regards. However, the best thing in terms of increasing the user base is natural growth

Idk, I just thought you guys came to the agreement that anyone below 20k had to be greenlit because of the problems it could cause. That's the only reason I was asking for one.

Followers seems pretty arbitrary when it comes to Lolcows but I understand why you would be hesitant to make threads on people who are not public figures.

Celebrities such as Justin Bieber or the Kardashians are used to being in the spotlight. They are "Kiwifarmed" everyday in a manner of speaking. They've earned their chops. Kim Kardashian probably wouldn't care about a thread on Kiwifarms or Onionfarms. The same simply isn't true about a private citizen who gets a spotlight shined in their face. They clam up. Public figures are somewhere in between depending on how much they are in the public spotlight.

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

stop pruning chat

 

[SIGSEGV]

stop pruning chat

Why?

 

[OneRootinTootinMotherFucker]

Why?

because even if someone hasnt said something in a while, the last few messages in chat usually give you something to go off of to greet people.

 

[SIGSEGV]

because even if someone hasnt said something in a while, the last few messages in chat usually give you something to go off of to greet people.

I don't know how much storage @OnionNull has available.

 

[Onion NullOnion Null is verified member.]

But think how much it would piss off @Feline Darkmage.

Me being a mod and him not would be the funniest shit ever

I don't know how much storage @OnionNull has available.

I will check the storage tonight.