Onionfarms.online: The Geopolitical and Current Events Forum

All are welcome.

If you have a technical issue with Xenforo: Please post your request in the Town Square or the Talk to Staff (If you want more privacy) and one of us will check it out to address your concerns.Thank you for all your forum contributions (Owner - Onion Null).


Community Featured Submissions:

Computer & Internet Related Why do Tech companies insist on internet connected "smart" devices?

Computer & Internet Related Discussion
People are also forgetting good ol' herd mentality, where companies are doing what other companies are doing because that's what other companies are doing, not matter how stupid it may seem.
 
consoomers: REEEEEEEEEEEEEE I CAN'T LISTEN TO FETTY WAP BECAUSE THE INTERNET IS DOWN

boomers: *smugly listens to thongsong.mp3 that they downloaded on napster 20 years ago*
Let me break it down for you.

Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media. I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange...well don't get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren't stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you'll be glad you did.
 
Back
Top