Hulk Hogan's Daughter Brooke has welcomed twins with her husband, former NHL player Steven Oleksy, marking them first-time parents and her wrestling star dad a grandfather.
Hulk Hogan's daughter Brooke Oleksy has a double surprise for the new year.
The wrestling icon's eldest child announced Jan. 18 that she has become a mom. The 36-year-old recently welcomed twins, a son and daughter, with her husband, former NHL player Steven Oleksy.
"So... just been staying off socials cooking these two cuties," Brooke wrote on her Instagram, alongside photos of her wearing a sweatshirt bearing the words "Mama est. 2025" while holding the babies while sitting in what appears to be a wheelchair in front of her partner. "Oliver Andrew Oleksy + Molly Gene Oleksy."
The Hogan Knows Best alum continued, "Born Jan 15, 2025 Our hearts have been made whole by the arrival of these two sweet souls we get to love. God is good."
Brooke and Steven's newborns are the first grandchildren for Hulk, 71, and ex-wife Linda, 65, who are also parents to son Nick Hogan, 34.
Brooke Knows Best alum had never announced a pregnancy or plans to start a family. She had confirmed just over one year ago that she and Steven had gotten married.
Brooke had confirmed just over a year ago that she and Steven had tied the knot, one day after photos of the two at their wedding were published by TMZ, which reported the event took place in 2022.
"A rare sighting of the husband," she wrote on Instagram on New Year's Day 2024. "We like to keep to ourselves, but somehow the news is out. So here he is, people: The kindest, sweetest badass you'll ever meet. I'm really lucky. God did me a solid on this one."
Brooke continued, "Thank you for all the kind words of celebration and encouragement. We feel so blessed. Thank you for being kind. Now back to our regularly scheduled privacy."
Article
Archive
They can practice in Texas as long as they are partnered with a firm that is licensed in Texas.
My mistake. I jumped the gun on this.Why is this misleading? Are you claiming that Matthew D. Hardin isn't allowed to rep Null in Texas? You're just posting a series of screenshots of Hardin using a mail delivery address in Livingston. TX while not being barred in Texas himself, expecting us to infer your argument from these screenshots, but I really don't get your point. What is your actual point? Are you claiming that Hardin is pretending to be a Texas lawyer when he's not? Is that it?
Matthew D. Hardin is Null's "pro hac vice" (aka "for this occasion") attorney in the State of Texas, as clearly stated on documents published on KF itself:
View attachment 81218
Hardin clearly states on his professional website that he works as a pro hac vice lawyer with other lawyers in different states, "in connection with a local attorney":
So again, where is your evidence that it's "misleading" for Null to claim that Matthew Hardin is his pro hac vice lawyer in Texas?
Just because Hardin is not himself barred in Texas itself doesn't mean he can't be granted permission by a Texas court to act as a pro hac vice lawyer, as long as he teams up with a barred Texas lawyer and doesn't attempt to rep Null on his own.
Do you know who Null's actual Texas lawyer is? Or are you just making assumptions that Null doesn't have a Texas lawyer and is now misrepresenting Hardin as his Texas lawyer by using that mail delivery address in Livingston, TX?
Can you cite any actual Texas process law for this apparent insinuation that it's "misleading" for Hardin to rep Null pro hac vice in Texas?