Debate Life is Ruff and Whales Forever on the importance of internet stickers

[Life is ruff]

dislike and disagree are neutral

Don't worry, they'll serve their purpose of getting people mad, if that's what you're worried about.

 

[Noghoul]

all of the bad ratings are gone so yea its a hugbox

dislike and disagree are neutral

Stickers are serious business

 

[Witthel 2.0]

Stickers are serious business

Personally, I understand both sides of the sticker issue.

On the one hand, you have those who give out neg-rates, and then they don't contribute in any real discussion. They believe as if the sticker should be the signifier of their opinions and viewpoints and nothing more. They don't feel the need to add to the discussion to make it more autistic or to get validation for their opinion. Their sticker speaks for itself and they move on with their day. Or sometimes, they add the sticker because "lol ur (this sticker)". After all, that's what they're there for. That's their purpose. To be a representation of your approval or disapproval or just your reaction.

But then you have those who get those negrates and are desperate in wanting someone to come at them with a rebuttal to their viewpoints or whatnot. But they grow increasingly dissatisfied with the idea that LOL IT'S JUST STICKERS. Well obviously, the person using those ratings rated the person's response with the sticker, the sticker being the thing that represents their beliefs on a situation. The person rated with that sticker wants to hear more from that person beyond the sticker shitposting to see if their arguments have weight. So if you don't give any sort of rebuttal and just leave it at a sticker, the person becomes increasingly angry at you or whatnot, irrationally. This is what led to that utterly hilarious thread with @crocodilian sperging out about @snailslime and @zedkissed60. After all, it's a forum where we can say whatever the fuck we want almost as long as it doesn't inconvenience Our Dear Leader.

There's an interesting grasp of psychology to it all. To the way we use the internet, the way we communicate, interactions, and whatnot. How the stickers are so specific in their purpose in response to other people's posts. How one can become obsessed with people's opinions and perspectives and what they meant by just one sticker. They are quite an interesting weapon.

 

[Life is ruff]

Personally, I understand both sides of the sticker issue.

On the one hand, you have those who give out neg-rates, and then they don't contribute in any real discussion. They believe as if the sticker should be the signifier of their opinions and viewpoints and nothing more. They don't feel the need to add to the discussion to make it more autistic or to get validation for their opinion. Their sticker speaks for itself and they move on with their day. Or sometimes, they add the sticker because "lol ur (this sticker)". After all, that's what they're there for. That's their purpose. To be a representation of your approval or disapproval or just your reaction.

But then you have those who get those negrates and are desperate in wanting someone to come at them with a rebuttal to their viewpoints or whatnot. But they grow increasingly dissatisfied with the idea that LOL IT'S JUST STICKERS. Well obviously, the person using those ratings rated the person's response with the sticker, the sticker being the thing that represents their beliefs on a situation. The person rated with that sticker wants to hear more from that person beyond the sticker shitposting to see if their arguments have weight. So if you don't give any sort of rebuttal and just leave it at a sticker, the person becomes increasingly angry at you or whatnot, irrationally. This is what led to that utterly hilarious thread with @crocodilian sperging out about @snailslime and @zedkissed60. After all, it's a forum where we can say whatever the fuck we want almost as long as it doesn't inconvenience Our Dear Leader.

There's an interesting grasp of psychology to it all. To the way we use the internet, the way we communicate, interactions, and whatnot. How the stickers are so specific in their purpose in response to other people's posts. How one can become obsessed with people's opinions and perspectives and what they meant by just one sticker. They are quite an interesting weapon.

 

[Ashley'sDemonCunt]

dislike and disagree are neutral

 

[Life is ruff]

Yes

>stickers don't matter
>it's a hugbox without me being able to give them a trashcan
Pick one.

 

[SIGSEGV]

>stickers don't matter
>it's a hugbox without me being able to give them a trashcan
Pick one.

No.

 

[Noghoul]

>stickers don't matter
>it's a hugbox without me being able to give them a trashcan
Pick one.

Sneed

 

[Life is ruff]

No.

Gay.

Sneed

's Feed

 

[Life is ruff]

I like the sticker changes to A&N. They can't just mass downvote people who piss them off anymore because their only options are dislike (neutral score change) and Respectfully Disagree, which is a positive rating. At the very least this will get under the skin of the users with the worst reddit mindsets as they now have to explain why they disagree with unpopular people instead of just give them the all powerful hat.

They're stickers, they don't matter positive or negative.

I can't rate you dumb, so I'm replying to call you a retard. Kill yourself, faggot.

Gay and MATI.

 

[Whales Forever]

They're stickers, they don't matter positive or negative.

They shouldn't. But they do to a lot of people, so its funny to think that all the retards who would negrate retards for violating their hugbox now don't have that option.

 

[Life is ruff]

They shouldn't. But they do to a lot of people, so its funny to think that all the retards who would negrate retards for violating their hugbox now don't have that option.

muh negrates